Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Jan;87(1):40-3.
doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00362-2.

Peritoneal closure at vaginal hysterectomy: a reassessment

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Peritoneal closure at vaginal hysterectomy: a reassessment

G H Lipscomb et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with or without peritoneal closure.

Methods: This study was a randomized trial. Using computer-generated numbers, all patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy without oophorectomy were randomized to either no peritoneal closure (n = 57) or routine peritoneal closure (n = 49). Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1 year for development of complications and postoperative dyspareunia. At 4-6 postoperative weeks, the distance between the ovaries and the vaginal cuff was measured by ultrasound.

Results: Postoperative complications were similar in both groups. The incidence of deep-thrust dyspareunia at 6 and 12 months was also similar. No statistical differences between the two groups were noted in the ovary to vaginal cuff distances either overall or when patients with dyspareunia were considered separately.

Conclusion: The data in this study do not support the use of reperitonealization on a routine basis. However, because of a lack of statistical power, larger studies will be required to confirm this theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types