Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation
- PMID: 8536552
- DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199550040-00006
Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation
Abstract
Propofol is a phenolic derivative that is structurally unrelated to other sedative hypnotic agents. It has been used extensively as an anaesthetic agent, particularly in procedures of short duration. More recently it has been investigated as a sedative in the intensive care unit (ICU) where it produces sedation and hypnosis in a dose-dependent manner. Propofol also provides control of stress responses and has anticonvulsant and amnesic properties. Importantly, its pharmacokinetic properties are characterised by a rapid onset and short duration of action. Noncomparative and comparative trials have evaluated the use of propofol for the sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU (postsurgical, general medical, trauma). Overall, propofol provides satisfactory sedation and is associated with good haemodynamic stability. It produces results similar to or better than those seen with midazolam or other comparator agents when the quality of sedation and/or the amount of time that patients were at adequate levels of sedation are measured. Patients sedated with propofol also tend to have a faster recovery (time to spontaneous ventilation or extubation) than patients sedated with midazolam. Although most studies did not measure time to discharge from the ICU, propofol tended to be superior to midazolam in this respect. In a few small trials in patients with head trauma or following neurosurgery, propofol was associated with adequate sedation and control of cerebral haemodynamics. The rapid recovery of patients after stopping propofol makes it an attractive option in the ICU, particularly for patients requiring only short term sedation. In short term sedation, propofol, despite its generally higher acquisition costs, has the potential to reduce overall medical costs if patients are able to be extubated and discharged from the ICU sooner. Because of the potential for hyperlipidaemia and the development of tolerance to its sedative effects, and because of the reduced need for rapid reversal of drug effects in long term sedation, the usefulness of propofol in long term situations is less well established. While experience with propofol for the sedation of patients in the ICU is extensive, there are still areas requiring further investigation. These include studies in children, trials examining cerebral and haemodynamic outcomes following long term administration and in patients with head trauma and, importantly, pharmacoeconomic investigations to determine those situations where propofol is cost effective. In the meantime, propofol is a well established treatment native to benzodiazepines and/or other hypnotics or analgesics when sedation of patients in the ICU is required. In particular, propofol possesses unique advantages over these agents in patients requiring only short term sedation.
Similar articles
-
Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults.CNS Drugs. 2003;17(4):235-72. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317040-00003. CNS Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12665397 Review.
-
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation.Crit Care. 2015 Feb 19;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0787-y. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25887576 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction.J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02128.x. J Clin Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18482144 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):932-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00010. Crit Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8681594 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimal intravenous dosing strategies for sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Clin. 1995 Oct;11(4):827-47. Crit Care Clin. 1995. PMID: 8535981 Review.
Cited by
-
SEDASYS(®), airway, oxygenation, and ventilation: anticipating and managing the challenges.Dig Dis Sci. 2014 May;59(5):920-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2996-z. Epub 2014 Jan 8. Dig Dis Sci. 2014. PMID: 24399055 Review.
-
Effects of propofol anesthesia versus sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.J Pain Res. 2018 Jun 25;11:1247-1254. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164889. eCollection 2018. J Pain Res. 2018. PMID: 29983588 Free PMC article.
-
Clonidine for sedation in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2017 Feb 25;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1610-8. Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28330506 Free PMC article.
-
The Missing Piece? A Case for Microglia's Prominent Role in the Therapeutic Action of Anesthetics, Ketamine, and Psychedelics.Neurochem Res. 2023 Apr;48(4):1129-1166. doi: 10.1007/s11064-022-03772-0. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Neurochem Res. 2023. PMID: 36327017 Review.
-
Comparative evaluation of midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and propofol as Intensive Care Unit sedatives in postoperative electively ventilated eclamptic patients.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul-Sep;33(3):331-336. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_380_15. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 29109631 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources