An approach in the assessment of pacing hemodynamics: a comparison of VVI and DDD

Abstract

Previous methods for assessment of pacemaker hemodynamics have been limited to a rigid hospital environment. An alternative is the ambulatory ventricular function monitor (C-VEST) that, with a single injection of technetium-99m, permits the continuous measurement of relative ejection fraction (EF) and cardiac output (CO) during the activities of daily living. A study of reproducibility and a comparison of dual chamber (DDD) and fixed rate ventricular (VVI) pacing are presented. Reproducibility was assessed in six patients (4 males; mean age 58, range 27-78 years) with a mean EF of 48.5% (range 34%-62%) and DDD pacemakers, implanted for conduction abnormalities. In addition, 11 patients (7 males; mean age 55.5, range 34-75 years) with a mean EF of 48.5% (range 34%-65%), chronic complete heart block, and DDD pacemakers were used for the comparative study. After an initial multigated scan, the monitor was positioned over the left ventricle and kept in place with the plastic C-VEST. The patients undergoing the reproducibility study performed three shuttle walking tests with 20 minutes of rest in between. The patients in the comparative study were randomized to either VVI or DDD mode and performed one shuttle walking test in each pacing mode. The results confirmed that the C-VEST produces reproducible results with no significant difference in peak CO between the three shuttle walks. In addition, it confirmed previous hemodynamic studies showing that DDD pacing was superior to VVI pacing both at rest (P < 0.004) and at exercise (P < 0.002). These findings show the C-VEST to be an extremely useful tool for the hemodynamic assessment of pacemaker patients.