Intramuscular meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tracts. Italian Intramuscular Meropenem Study Group
- PMID: 8543487
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.109
Intramuscular meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tracts. Italian Intramuscular Meropenem Study Group
Abstract
In three open, multicentre, prospective randomised studies, the efficacy and safety of meropenem were assessed and compared with ceftazidime (Study 1) and imipenem/cilastatin (Studies 2 and 3) in 864 patients; 417 with urinary tract infections (UTI) and 447 with community acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). All the antibiotics were administered by intramuscular injection. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed at the end of therapy and at follow-up (2-4 weeks for LRTI, 4-6 weeks for UTI). The clinical response rate in UTI at the end of therapy was 93-100% for meropenem 500 mg tds compared with 94-95% for ceftazidime 500 mg tds; for meropenem 500 mg bd it was 97%, significantly higher than that for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg bd which was 90% (P = 0.03). At follow-up, the response rates were 90% for meropenem tds compared with 81-85% for ceftazidime 500 mg tds and 81% for meropenem bd compared with 78% for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg bd. The clinical response rate in LRTI at end of therapy was 93% for meropenem 500 mg tds, compared with 92% for ceftazidime 1 g tds; for meropenem 500 mg bd the clinical response rate was 96%, compared with 91% for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg bd (P = 0.054). At follow-up, the clinical response rates were 96%, 89%, 93% and 96%, respectively. The bacteriological response rates at 5-9 days post-therapy in UTI were 61-84% in patients treated with meropenem 500 mg tds, compared to 73-82% in patients treated with ceftazidime 500 mg tds; the rates for meropenem 500 mg bd and imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg bd were each 75%. At follow-up, the response rates were 40-72%, 57-70%, 51% and 49%, respectively. In LRTI, bacteriological response rates at the end of therapy were 91% for both meropenem 500 mg tds and ceftazidime 1 g tds, and 91% for meropenem 500 mg bd compared with 86% for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg bd. At follow-up, the response rates were 87%, 77%, 84% and 79%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. In these studies, intramuscular meropenem proved to be an effective and well tolerated treatment for LRTI and UTI.
Similar articles
-
Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.523. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996. PMID: 8889726 Clinical Trial.
-
Empirical monotherapy with meropenem in serious bacterial infections. Meropenem Study Group.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:145-56. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.145. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995. PMID: 8543490 Clinical Trial.
-
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery. Meropenem Study Group.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:191-205. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.191. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995. PMID: 8543495 Clinical Trial.
-
Changing role of carbapenems in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:17-23. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995. PMID: 7652498 Review.
-
[Multicenter comparative study of meropenem vs. imipenem in the intramuscular treatment of hospital infections of the urinary tract].Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1995 Sep;47(3):147-56. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1995. PMID: 8815553 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Ambulatory use of parenteral antibacterials: contemporary perspectives.Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:1-8; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00001. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 10845408 Review.
-
Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.Drugs. 1995 Jul;50(1):73-101. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550010-00007. Drugs. 1995. PMID: 7588092 Review.
-
Meropenem. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious infections.Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):359-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00010. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998. PMID: 10178661
-
Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;9(4):215-28. doi: 10.1155/1998/831425. Can J Infect Dis. 1998. PMID: 22346545 Free PMC article.
-
Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1233-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1233. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998. PMID: 9593156 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical