[Pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation of rilmenidine in 18,235 hypertensive patients]
- PMID: 8545441
[Pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation of rilmenidine in 18,235 hypertensive patients]
Abstract
Objectives: Assess the effects of rilmenidine in routine clinical practice.
Methods: 18,235 patients with high blood pressure--mean age 61.2 years, arterial systolic pressure in supine position (SSP) over arterial diastolic pressure in supine position (SDP) at day 0: 174.58 +/- 0.12/101.51 +/- 0.06 mmHg--were followed by 2,072 general physicians. Treatment was initiated with a daily dose of 1 mg rilmenidine which was adapted as needed at different times in the study. At inclusion, diastolic pressure was between 90 and 115 mmHg in 84.5% of the patients; 1,126 patients had severe hypertension (SDP > or = 115 mmHg); 16,496 of these patients (81.5%) were followed for one year.
Results: Mean fall in blood pressure between day 0 and month 12 was -28.7/-19.3 mmHg in the overall study population and -27.4/-18.9 mmHg in patients treated with 1 mg/day. Mean fall in blood pressure was comparable in the 8 risk populations identified. The percentage of patients who achieved normalized blood pressure status was 96.2% (SDP < or = 90 mmHg); 59.1% with a 1 mg daily dose, 23.7% with 2 mg/day, 11.6% with two-drug treatment and 1.8% with three-drug treatment. Acceptability, taking into account all possible imputabilities (more than 35,000 coprescriptions) and associated diseases, the incidence of undesirable side effects never exceeded 5.6% of the overall study population (5.2% in single-drug treatment, 8.3% in two- or three-drug treatment) and only 3.6% of the patients withdrew from the study due to an undesirable effect whether imputable to the treatment or not. There was little change in heart rate (mean--3 beats per minute between day 0 and month 12); variations observed depended on the rate at study onset. Laboratory tests (blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, potassium, creatinine, uric acid) were not changed in any of the population groups.
Conclusions: This pharmaco-epidemiologic study showed that the benefit/acceptability ratio for rilmenidine is quite satisfactory and confirms the contribution of rilmenidine as first line treatment for hypertension.
Similar articles
-
[Efficacy and acceptability of rilmenidine in a population of 2 738 hypertensive diabetic patients].Presse Med. 2002 Nov 23;31(39 Pt 1):1864-8. Presse Med. 2002. PMID: 12496718 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Dose-effect relationship of rilmenidine after chronic administration.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(2):157-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00315498. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 8223838 Clinical Trial.
-
[Rilmenidine, a new antihypertensive agent in the first line treatment of essential arterial hypertension. Multicenter double-blind study versus atenolol].Presse Med. 1991 Aug 31-Sep 7;20(27):1265-71. Presse Med. 1991. PMID: 1832761 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Rilmenidine: a clinical overview.Am J Hypertens. 2000 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):106S-111S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(00)00226-0. Am J Hypertens. 2000. PMID: 10921529 Review.
-
Update on rilmenidine: clinical benefits.Am J Hypertens. 2001 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):322S-324S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02239-7. Am J Hypertens. 2001. PMID: 11721891 Review.
Cited by
-
An Actual Perspective on I1-Imidazoline Agonists in Blood Pressure Control. Results of a Multicentric Observational Prospective Study.Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):547-554. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.547. Maedica (Bucur). 2023. PMID: 38348076 Free PMC article.
-
I1 imidazoline agonists. General clinical pharmacology of imidazoline receptors: implications for the treatment of the elderly.Drugs Aging. 2000 Aug;17(2):133-59. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200017020-00005. Drugs Aging. 2000. PMID: 10984201 Review.
-
[Sympathetic overactivity and the kidney].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003 Sep 30;115(17-18):634-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03040468. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003. PMID: 14603734 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical