Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications
- PMID: 8551467
Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prevalence of uterine anomalies and relative reproductive function in 322 women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) evaluated by diagnostic hysteroscopy.
Study design: Uterine contours were classified as septate/bicornuate, arcuate or normal on the basis of hysteroscopy. A complete medical history was obtained from all the subjects; it included a questionnaire on menstrual characteristics, reproductive history and pregnancy outcome. Cumulative birth rates, frequency of spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, malpresentation and mode of delivery in patients with normal and abnormal uteri were compared using life table analysis, the log-rank test and chi 2 analysis.
Results: Arcuate, septate/bicornuate and unicornuate uteri were observed in 6.5%, 3.7% and 0.3% of women, respectively. Although 24-month pregnancy rates and monthly fecundability rates were similar in women with and without müllerian anomalies, the 36-month cumulative live birth rate was significantly lower in women with a septate/bicornuate uterus. Overall, women with uterine malformations showed a significantly higher miscarriage rate (P < .05) and a significantly lower term delivery rate (P < .05) than women with a normal-shaped uterus.
Conclusion: Diagnostic hysteroscopy in women with AUB detected a 10% prevalence of uterine anomalies, which were associated with a significantly higher incidence of spontaneous abortion and lower cumulative live birth rates.
Similar articles
-
Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;19(3):229-37. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b0649. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17495638 Review.
-
Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Jan-Feb;13(1):33-9. doi: 10.1089/154099904322836438. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004. PMID: 15006276 Review.
-
Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies: a population-based study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):537.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17547885
-
Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13723. Semin Reprod Med. 2000. PMID: 11355792 Review.
-
Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China.Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 20;123(4):418-22. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010. PMID: 20193480
Cited by
-
Maternofetal Outcomes in Women With Congenital Uterine Anomalies.Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73430. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39664165 Free PMC article.
-
Studying Müllerian duct anomalies - from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation.Dis Model Mech. 2021 Jun 1;14(6):dmm047977. doi: 10.1242/dmm.047977. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Dis Model Mech. 2021. PMID: 34160006 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Mar;16(1):9-22. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 38551471 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):761-71. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Hum Reprod Update. 2011. PMID: 21705770 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 20;10(21):4797. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214797. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768344 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical