Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Oct;9(10):1059-64.
doi: 10.1007/BF00188987.

Peritoneal host defenses are less impaired by laparoscopy than by open operation

Affiliations

Peritoneal host defenses are less impaired by laparoscopy than by open operation

D Collet et al. Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct.

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence that laparoscopic surgery is physiologically less injurious than open surgery. We hypothesized that the open technique results in a greater impairment of peritoneal and systemic defense mechanisms than does the laparoscopic technique. Nissen fundoplication, standardized in technique and duration, was performed in 16 pigs. The procedure was performed through a standard midline incision (OPEN, n = 8) or with laparoscopic technique and CO2 pneumoperitoneum (LAP, n = 8). The peritoneal cavity was instilled with 400 cc of normal saline, either alone (not contamined, n = 8) or containing 10(9) E. coli/ml (contaminated, n = 8). Quantitative cultures, cell count, and flow cytometry were performed on blood and peritoneal fluid samples obtained at timed intervals. We found that host defense processes were better preserved after LAP than by OPEN surgery. Peritoneal and systemic monocyte class II antigen expression, and serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity was greater in the OPEN group compared with the LAP group, but peritoneal bacterial clearance was more efficient in the LAP group. These data may illustrate a potential benefit of laparoscopic surgery in cases of peritoneal contamination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):396-8 - PubMed
    1. Acta Chir Scand. 1983;149(4):383-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1992 Feb;163(2):221-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1993 Apr;80(4):439-41 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1988 Jun;207(6):686-92 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources