Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Oct;9(10):1070-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00188989.

Single-stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones in 120 unselected, consecutive patients

Affiliations

Single-stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones in 120 unselected, consecutive patients

E Lezoche et al. Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct.

Abstract

Feasibility, success rate, safety, and short-term results of single-stage, laparoscopic, transcystic--whenever possible--or choledochotomic treatment of gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones were evaluated in 120 unselected patients. Of 1095 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 120 had ductal stones; among those patients, stones were suspected or proven in 72, 27 of whom were referred after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) performed elsewhere; unsuspected CBD stones were discovered in 48. The procedure was successful in 116 patients. Four patients required conversion to open surgery. The transcystic access was feasible in 77 patients; a choledochotomy was required in 39. Incidence of retained CBD stones was 4.3%. Minor complications, major complications, and mortality were observed in 6.8%, 1.7%, and 0.8% of patients, respectively. Single-stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and CBD stones in unselected patients is safe and feasible in the majority of cases, with success rates and short-term results that are not inferior to reported results of ERCP/ES and cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Feb;64(2):75-80 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):627-33; discussion 633-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1994 Dec;8(12):1389-93; discussion 1393-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1994 Dec;8(12 ):1443-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):474-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources