Predictive power of increased heart rate versus depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Results of a two-year follow-up study
- PMID: 8557893
- DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00454-8
Predictive power of increased heart rate versus depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Results of a two-year follow-up study
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of mean RR interval assessed from predischarge Holter recordings with that of heart rate variability and left ventricular ejection fraction for risk stratification after myocardial infarction.
Background: Heart rate variability is a powerful tool for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Although heart rate variability is related to heart rate, little is known of the prognostic value of 24-h mean heart rate.
Methods: A total of 579 patients surviving the acute phase of myocardial infarction were followed up for at least 2 years. Predischarge heart rate variability, 24-h mean RR interval and left ventricular ejection fraction were analyzed.
Results: During the first 2 years of follow-up, there were 54 deaths, 42 of which were cardiac (26 sudden). Shorter mean RR interval was a better predictor of all-cause mortality as well as cardiac and sudden death than depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Depressed heart rate variability predicted the risk of death better than mean RR interval for sensitivities < 40%. For sensitivities > or = 40%, mean RR interval was as powerful as heart rate variability. All three variables performed equally well in predicting nonsudden cardiac death. For cardiac death prediction, a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% had a 40% sensitivity, 78% specificity and 14% positive predictive accuracy; a mean RR interval < 700 ms had a 45% sensitivity, 85% specificity and 20% positive predictive accuracy; and a heart rate variability < 17 U had a 40% sensitivity, 86% specificity and 20% positive predictive accuracy.
Conclusions: Predischarge 24-h mean heart rate is a strong predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction that can compete with left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability.
Similar articles
-
[Risk of mortality after myocardial infarction: value of heart rate, its variability and left ventricular ejection fraction].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996 Jul;89(7):865-71. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996. PMID: 8869248 French.
-
Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators.Lancet. 1998 Feb 14;351(9101):478-84. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11144-8. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9482439
-
Distinction between arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate variability, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00169-6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8800101
-
QT dispersion and heart rate variability in sudden death risk stratification in patients with ischemic heart disease.Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(6):450-4. Medicina (Kaunas). 2006. PMID: 16816538 Review.
-
Arrhythmic risk stratification of post-myocardial infarction patients.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Jan;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200001000-00001. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10666655 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic value of initial electrocardiography in predicting long-term all-cause mortality in COVID-19.J Electrocardiol. 2022 Nov-Dec;75:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 12. J Electrocardiol. 2022. PMID: 36272350 Free PMC article.
-
Potential interests of heart rate lowering drugs.Heart. 1999 Apr;81(4):336-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.336. Heart. 1999. PMID: 10092556 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Optimal Timing of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Acute Myocardial Infarction.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 2;23(4):124. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304124. eCollection 2022 Apr. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39076214 Free PMC article.
-
Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Jan;10(1):88-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.10101.x. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005. PMID: 15649244 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential effect of β-blockers for heart rate control in coronary artery disease.Clin Cardiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):748-54. doi: 10.1002/clc.20981. Epub 2011 Nov 14. Clin Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 22083944 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical