Clinical cardiomyoplasty: review of the ten-year United States experience
- PMID: 8561617
- DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01005-X
Clinical cardiomyoplasty: review of the ten-year United States experience
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials of dynamic cardiomyoplasty were pioneered at Allegheny General Hospital beginning in September 1985. Data from 9 years of experience with the procedure at this institution and more recent data from newer cardiomyoplasty centers have been analyzed for outcome analysis and future trends.
Methods: Each patient underwent a cardiomyoplasty procedure using the left or right latissimus dorsi muscle. Thirty-four patients were studied at Allegheny: 5 patients implanted with dual chamber pacemakers as single stimulus myostimulators, 11 patients composing the phase I Food and Drug Administration trial of the Medtronic burst myostimulator, and 18 patients entered in the phase II Medtronic trial. Patients from seven additional centers entered the phase II trial in 1991. Fifty-seven patients completed follow-up studies to 1 year after operation in this trial.
Results: Operative mortality was 5/57 (11%) in the American phase II group and 5/34 (15%) in the Allegheny group (1/18, 6% for Allegheny phase II). Nineteen patients (19/57, 33%) from the combined phase II population died in the first year, and 10/34 (29%) in the Allegheny study. The predominant cause of postdischarge death was arrhythmia (12/19, 63% American; 7/10, 70% Allegheny). In all groups significant improvement was seen in quality of life and functional class. Phase II patients demonstrated significant increases in ejection fraction and stroke work.
Conclusions: Failure to sustain improvement and arrhythmia-related death are complex challenges for this procedure; however, realistic solutions have been proposed and are under investigation.
Comment in
-
Suggestions for overcoming the weak points of cardiomyoplasty.Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Oct;62(4):1245-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)85173-3. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996. PMID: 8823138 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Study of muscular and ventricular function in dynamic cardiomyoplasty: a ten-year follow-up.J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Aug;16(8):854-68. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997. PMID: 9286778
-
Dynamic cardiomyoplasty in South America.Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):408-12. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00998-1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996. PMID: 8561616
-
[Dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Preliminary experience].Rev Esp Cardiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):23-32. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 8128081 Spanish.
-
[Mid-term results of cardiomyoplasty].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994 Jan;87(1):49-56. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994. PMID: 7811151 Review. French.
-
Cardiomyoplasty--the beginning of a new era.Isr J Med Sci. 1996 May;32(5):321-6. Isr J Med Sci. 1996. PMID: 8641874 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical approaches to dilated cardiomyopathy.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000 Mar;2(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s11886-000-0005-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000. PMID: 10980879 Review.
-
Girdling effect of adynamic cardiomyoplasty in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy.Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;50(3):104-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02913470. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 11968716
-
Cardioprotective effect of silicon-built restraint device (ASD), for left ventricular remodeling in rat heart failure model.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022 May 10;33(5):42. doi: 10.1007/s10856-022-06663-6. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022. PMID: 35536369 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic cardiomyoplasty as a therapeutic alternative: current status.Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Sep;6(3):201-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1011445719023. Heart Fail Rev. 2001. PMID: 11391038 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources