F-bodies as Y chromosome markers in mature human sperm heads: a quantitative approach

Abstract

It is generally accepted that at least some Y chromosomes in human mature sperm heads are represented in preparations by fluorescent F-bodies. From data consisting solely of F-body scorings and the visually estimated size of sperm heads from normal donors, a quantitative model is developed which permits simultaneous estimation of six parameters representing biological factors (the proportions of ploidy classes and of their sex-chromosome complements) and biassing factors (not all Y chromosomes represented by F-bodies, not all F-bodies representing Y chromosomes, and error in scoring ploidy from visual size). The analysis is statistically adequate and succeeds in predicting a variety of independently validated phenomena. The work may be regarded as a contribution to the integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence in the study of F-bodies. In all, 21,700 one-headed spermatozoa from 12 donors were scored. A mean of 54% spermatozoa lacking F-bodies was subject to a standard deviation between donors of 4.8, over and above binomial error. Analysis yielded the following estimates: 83.3% of diploid spermatozoa are XY, the remainder XX and YY in assumed equal number (this information assists analysis of the origin of embryonic triploidy); 2.4% of spermatozoa are diploid (this estimate does not compete in accuracy with direct estimates from DNA absorbance); only 83% of Y chromosomes are represented by F-bodies; 7% of haploid heads and 14% of diploids contain one or more "adventitious bodies" indistinguishable from true F-bodies. The visually scored head sizes "Small" and "Medium" correspond approximately with haploidy and diploidy; nearly all haploids are scored as Small, and 72% of the Medium are diploid. F-bodies are not thought at present to give a useful basis for estimating the presumably low incidence of sex-chromosome aneuploidy and nondisjunction. No such estimate has been attempted. The problem is overshadowed by not fully understood complicating factors of greater magnitude, which now appear to be a major subject of enquiry. Some implications and possible future developments are discussed.