Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Aug;14(8):719-23.
doi: 10.1007/BF01690884.

Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity

B J Thomas et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Aug.

Abstract

A commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Amplicor, Roche) for Chlamydia trachomatis was compared with a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test using urethral and cervical samples, many of which on the basis of prior testing by DFA contained small rather than large numbers of elementary bodies. Urine samples were collected from patients in a sequential unselected manner. Of 244 clinical specimens (138 male urethral and cervical; 106 male and female urine), 66 were positive by both DFA and PCR and 141 were negative by both tests. Nine samples were DFA negative and PCR positive, and 28 samples were DFA positive and PCR negative. However, 24 (86%) of the latter samples contained fewer than ten elementary bodies. When serial dilutions of laboratory stock strains (serovars E and H) were tested, the DFA test detected Chlamydia trachomatis at a dilution tenfold greater than the PCR. Furthermore, of five DFA-positive clinical samples, three that were PCR negative when tested according to the manufacturer's instructions were positive when they were diluted less. A modification of the PCR assay along these lines might improve sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;11(6):499-503 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1993 May;46(5):408-10 - PubMed
    1. Genitourin Med. 1994 Jun;70(3):162-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1992 Jun;45(6):531-2 - PubMed
    1. Genitourin Med. 1991 Jun;67(3):256-66 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources