Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):254-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70403-9.

A critique of the new recommendations for weight gain in pregnancy

Affiliations
Review

A critique of the new recommendations for weight gain in pregnancy

J W Johnson et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan.

Abstract

Recent Institute of Medicine recommendations for weight gain in pregnancy advocate a marked increase over prior guidelines, and for reasons that must be questioned. The objectives of these new guidelines are to reduce perinatal mortality, prematurity, and fetal growth retardation. Evidence of a causal relationship between less maternal weight gain and these adverse outcomes is lacking. In addition, the consequences of increased pregnancy weight gain have been incompletely assessed. The risk-to-benefit ratio may be prohibitive. The new recommendations, which will be considered by many to be clinical guidelines, fall short of the formulation criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Pregnancy weight gain--not excessive.
    Lederman SA. Lederman SA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1395-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70072-8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8942530 No abstract available.
  • Weight gain and pregnancy outcome.
    Brown JE, Mahan CS. Brown JE, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1396-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70073-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8942531 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types