Re: Comparison of efficacy in crossing femoropopliteal artery occlusions with movable core and hydrophilic guidewires
- PMID: 8581912
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00239428
Re: Comparison of efficacy in crossing femoropopliteal artery occlusions with movable core and hydrophilic guidewires
Comment on
-
Comparison of efficacy in crossing femoropopliteal artery occlusions with movable core and hydrophilic guidewires.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(6):319-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00203950. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994. PMID: 7882399
Similar articles
-
Comparison of efficacy in crossing femoropopliteal artery occlusions with movable core and hydrophilic guidewires.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(6):319-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00203950. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994. PMID: 7882399
-
Re: "Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in short femoropopliteal arterial stenoses".J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Oct;15(5):628-9; author reply 629-30. doi: 10.1583/08-2518L.1. J Endovasc Ther. 2008. PMID: 18840055 No abstract available.
-
Atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal disease: are we making progress?J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Aug;26(8):304-6. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25091094 No abstract available.
-
Indications and results with cryoplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.Vascular. 2006 Sep-Oct;14(5):290-6. doi: 10.2310/6670.2006.00047. Vascular. 2006. PMID: 17038299 Review.
-
Standard balloon angioplasty versus angioplasty with paclitaxel-eluting balloons for femoropopliteal artery stenosis.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Aug;53(4):459-63. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012. PMID: 22854525 Review.