Complications in pediatric urological laparoscopy: results of a survey
- PMID: 8583567
Complications in pediatric urological laparoscopy: results of a survey
Abstract
Purposes: To assess the level of activity in pediatric urological laparoscopy and its relationship to complications a survey of the membership of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Urology was conducted.
Materials and methods: An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to 251 pediatric urologists and 153 responses were recorded.
Results: Of the respondents 75% reported performing diagnostic and operative laparoscopy (average 54 cases). Patient age ranged from newborn to 20 years. Average case load for laparoscopy was 19 of 401 total cases yearly. More than 5,400 laparoscopic cases are represented by the reported experience. Complications were reported in 5.38% of cases (average complication rate 6.06% per practitioner). Excluding preperitoneal insufflation or subcutaneous emphysema the complication rate was 1.18%. Complications requiring surgical repair occurred in 0.39% of cases, including bowel, bladder and great vessel injury. The clearest predictor of complication rate was laparoscopic experience. The technique used to obtain pneumoperitoneum was also important in that Veress needle technique was associated with a 2.6% significant complication rate in contrast to 1.2% for open technique (p < 0.006).
Conclusions: Laparoscopy is widely practiced in the pediatric urological community with a good safety record. Complications occur and important means of minimizing them are to provide for supervised experience with emphasis on the details of safe technique.
Similar articles
-
Patterns and predictors of laparoscopic complications in pediatric urology: the role of ongoing surgical volume and access techniques.J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):681-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.042. Epub 2008 Jun 12. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18554647
-
Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy.J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2109-11. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11696716
-
Survey of urological laparoscopic practices in the state of California.J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2380-6. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 11992042
-
[Laparoscopy in pediatric urology].Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):737-47. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12224172 Review. Spanish.
-
Port site metastases in urological laparoscopic surgery.J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1213-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000035910.75480.4b. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12629331 Review.
Cited by
-
The evolving role of laparoscopic surgery in paediatric urology.Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Arab J Urol. 2012. PMID: 26558007 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Port-site complications after pediatric urologic robotic surgery.J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):187. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0160-8. Epub 2009 Oct 6. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638377
-
Robotic Urologic Surgery in the Infant: a Review.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 May 18;20(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0902-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31104148 Review.
-
Current Concepts in Pediatric Robotic Assisted Pyeloplasty.Front Pediatr. 2019 Jan 24;7:4. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00004. eCollection 2019. Front Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30733937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complications and conversions of pediatric videosurgery: the Italian multicentric experience on 1689 procedures.Surg Endosc. 2002 May;16(5):795-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9044-3. Epub 2002 Feb 8. Surg Endosc. 2002. PMID: 11997824
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources