Exercise performance of lower-extremity amputees
- PMID: 8584846
- DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199520040-00001
Exercise performance of lower-extremity amputees
Abstract
A comparison of the literature quantifying the energy expended during ambulation of healthy individuals and those with amputation of the lower extremity is difficult as study parameters and methods are inconsistent. However, the energy cost of ambulation is greater for amputees than for nonamputees. Ascending level of amputation appears to be associated with increasing metabolic demand. There appears to be a difference in energy cost of ambulation following different surgical procedures. The literature regarding energy cost of ambulating with different lower-extremity prostheses is equivocal, with the exception of the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM) socket for above-knee amputees and the new energy-storing (Proteor) foot for traumatic below-knee amputees, which may decrease energy expenditure during ambulation. Therefore, it is reasonable to recommend that energy cost of ambulation be considered when deciding on the most efficacious surgical procedure, and metabolic efficiency of gait be considered when selecting prostheses most suitable for lower-extremity amputees. Though limited research is currently available, it appears that training or physical conditioning for the lower-extremity amputee, particularly with cardiopulmonary or vascular insufficiency, may decrease the metabolic cost of ambulation. More research is needed regarding the benefits of aerobic exercise and the safest, most effective exercise regimens for reducing metabolic costs of ambulation in lower-extremity amputees.
Similar articles
-
The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket: a comparison of energy cost during ambulation.Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993 Aug;17(2):95-100. doi: 10.3109/03093649309164363. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993. PMID: 8233775 Clinical Trial.
-
Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995 May;32(2):111-9. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995. PMID: 7562650
-
Metabolic energy expenditure of ambulation in lower extremity amputees: what have we learned and what are the next steps?Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan;39(2):143-151. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1095948. Epub 2015 Oct 12. Disabil Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 26458225 Review.
-
Energy expenditure of below-knee amputees during harness-supported treadmill ambulation.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 May;21(5):268-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.5.268. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995. PMID: 7787850 Clinical Trial.
-
Gait analysis in amputees.Am J Phys Med. 1985 Apr;64(2):82-9. Am J Phys Med. 1985. PMID: 3887934 Review.
Cited by
-
Physiological Considerations to Support Podium Performance in Para-Athletes.Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Nov 16;2:732342. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.732342. eCollection 2021. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021. PMID: 36188768 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preparing for snow-sport events at the Paralympic Games in Beijing in 2022: recommendations and remaining questions.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Feb 22;8(1):e001294. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001294. eCollection 2022. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022. PMID: 35295372 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cycling of people with a lower limb amputation in Thailand.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 2;14(8):e0220649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220649. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31374098 Free PMC article.
-
Use of a Novel Adhesive Suture Retention Device in Non-traumatic Diabetic Lower Extremity Amputations: A Multicenter Case Review.Eplasty. 2023 Sep 7;23:e58. eCollection 2023. Eplasty. 2023. PMID: 37743966 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and reproducibility of accelerometry and heart rate in physical strain assessment during prosthetic gait.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0916-1. Epub 2003 Sep 16. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004. PMID: 13680239
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous