Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients
- PMID: 8586520
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02550083
Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients
Abstract
Bilateral vasovasostomies were performed in 7 previously vasectomized patients. The method employed was a modification of a one-layer anastomotic technique. There was no correlation between the presence of absence of sperm in the vas fluid, presence or absence of sperm granuloma, and site of vasectomy. No correlation was revealed between the presence or absence of sperm in the vas fluid and the duration of obstructive period. After vasovasostomy, sperm was observed in the ejaculate in 86% of the patients. Only one patient's partner became pregnant. However, the partner of one patient with short postoperative period and good seminal finding after vasovasostomy was expected to become pregnant. This modified method of one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy can be performed more easily and quickly, but requires further clinical experience and evaluation of usefulness.
PIP: For various reasons, some men seek the reversal of prior vasectomy. Macroscopic methods to reverse vasectomy and restore fertility have achieved patency rates of 50% or higher, but reports have also indicated that final fertility is attained in only 5-25% of cases. Higher patency and pregnancy rates have been reported using a two-layer microscopic technique. This paper reports the findings obtained after performing a modification of a one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. Bilateral vasovasostomies were performed in seven patients vasectomized 2-12 years before; the median interval between vasectomy and vasectomy reversal was 9 years. The men were aged 33-45 years (median age, 39 years). No correlation was identified between the presence or absence of sperm in the vas fluid, presence or absence of sperm granuloma, and site of vasectomy. Furthermore, no correlation was revealed between the presence or absence of sperm in the vas fluid and the duration of obstructive period. After vasovasostomy, sperm was observed in 86% of the patients, although only one patient's partner became pregnant. The partner of one patient with short postoperative period and good seminal finding after vasovasostomy is, however, expected to become pregnant. The authors note that while the modified method of one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy can be performed easier and quicker than the two-layer approach, it requires a higher level of clinical experience and additional evaluation of its usefulness.
Similar articles
-
Failed vasectomy reversal: is a further attempt using microsurgery worthwhile?BJU Int. 2000 Sep;86(4):474-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00766.x. BJU Int. 2000. PMID: 10971275
-
Vasectomy reversal--microsurgery for best results.Br J Urol. 1994 Apr;73(4):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07613.x. Br J Urol. 1994. PMID: 8199836
-
Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success.J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1153-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61616-1. J Urol. 1999. PMID: 10081859
-
Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: a systematic review.Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Aug;46(4):241-6. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.669790. Epub 2012 Mar 27. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22452615
-
Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Apr;50(4):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1810-4. Epub 2018 Feb 8. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 29423834 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic vasovasostomy: description of technique and review of initial results.J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):217-21. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0295-2. Epub 2011 Jul 8. J Robot Surg. 2012. PMID: 27638275
-
Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.Can Urol Assoc J. 2007 Nov;1(4):388-94. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.454. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007. PMID: 18542824 Free PMC article.
-
Current techniques in microsurgical reversal surgery.Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Feb;6(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0068-4. Curr Urol Rep. 2005. PMID: 15610698 Review.