Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Feb;198(2):403-9.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596840.

Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis

H Hricak et al. Radiology. 1996 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the cost and efficacy of diagnostic work-up in patients with invasive cervical cancer.

Materials and methods: In 246 patients with invasive cervical cancer, all diagnostic tests performed before treatment were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the initial study (n = 105) and those who did not (n = 141). A list of 1995 Medicare global payments was used to measure cost. Bayesian analysis (likelihood ratios derived from a literature search) was performed for bladder, rectal, parameterial, and nodal involvement in stage Ib disease.

Results: Significantly fewer procedures and fewer invasive studies were performed in the MR imaging group. Net cost savings for the MR imaging group was $401 for all patients and $449 for patients with stage Ib disease. For stage Ib disease, the 0% pretest probability of bladder or rectal invasion does not justify the routine use of barium enema examination, cystoscopy, or proctoscopy. The increase in predictive values for parameterial and nodal disease was highest for MR imaging when tumor size was at least 2 cm.

Conclusion: Guidelines for the pretreatment work-up of clinical stage Ib cervical cancer need revision. MR imaging should be used as an adjunct to clinical evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms