Human HepG2 and rat Fao hepatic-derived cell lines show different responses to ciprofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator: analysis by flow cytometry
- PMID: 8601421
- DOI: 10.1006/excr.1996.0099
Human HepG2 and rat Fao hepatic-derived cell lines show different responses to ciprofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator: analysis by flow cytometry
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferators, and especially hypolipidemic drugs such as ciprofibrate, are known to be hepatocarcinogens in rodents, but their effect in humans is controversial. In an attempt to investigate the effects of ciprofibrate at a cellular level, the analysis of individual whole cells was performed by flow cytometry on samples from two hepatic-derived cell lines: the rat Fao cell line and the human HepG2 cell line. The increase of light scatter signals in rat Fao cells treated for 3 days with ciprofibrate at 250 microM was related to modifications of intrinsic cellular parameters, such as size and cytoplasmic granularity. Conversely, no variations appeared in human HepG2-treated cells. Moreover, the study of the cell cycle distribution of asynchronously growing cells showed an increase in the percentage of proliferative cells in Fao-treated cells, but not in HepG2-treated cells. In order to give a simultaneous assessment of changes in cellular parameters and cell metabolism, these flow cytometric experiments were completed with the measurements of the palmitoyl-CoA oxidase activity, used as a marker of peroxisome proliferation. The cellular modifications in the rat Fao cell line were accompanied by a great increase in this enzymatic activity, whereas the human HepG2 cell line, which failed to exhibit changes of cytometric data, presented no, or weak, increase in this oxidase activity. The cellular modifications observed in the rat Fao cell line may be related to the well-known hepatocarcinogenicity of ciprofibrate in rodents, whereas the absence of response of HepG2 cells is in favor of the noncarcinogenicity of this drug in humans. This report validates another methodological approach for the investigation of the safety of peroxisome proliferators in humans.
Similar articles
-
Peroxisome proliferation and beta-oxidation in Fao and MH1C1 rat hepatoma cells, HepG2 human hepatoblastoma cells and cultured human hepatocytes: effect of ciprofibrate.Eur J Cell Biol. 1997 Apr;72(4):314-23. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997. PMID: 9127731
-
Effect of rodent hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferators on fatty acyl-CoA oxidase, DNA synthesis, and apoptosis in cultured human and rat hepatocytes.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998 Jun;150(2):277-86. doi: 10.1006/taap.1998.8413. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998. PMID: 9653058
-
Difference between guinea pig and rat in the liver peroxisomal response to equivalent plasmatic level of ciprofibrate.Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996 Mar 1;327(1):181-8. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0107. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996. PMID: 8615689
-
[Proliferation of peroxisomes and the hepatocarcinogenic process].Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1997;48(1):1-11. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1997. PMID: 9273657 Review. Polish.
-
Carcinogenesis by hepatic peroxisome proliferators: evaluation of the risk of hypolipidemic drugs and industrial plasticizers to humans.Crit Rev Toxicol. 1983;12(1):1-58. doi: 10.3109/10408448309029317. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1983. PMID: 6360536 Review.
Cited by
-
Clofibrate treatment in pigs: effects on parameters critical with respect to peroxisome proliferator-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in rodents.BMC Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 16;7:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2210-7-6. BMC Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17437637 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical