The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma
- PMID: 8603872
The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma
Abstract
Purpose: To study the relationship of reaction time to the psychometric function in normal subjects, normal sensitivity test locations in patients with glaucoma, and test locations with 10 to 20 dB loss in patients with glaucoma.
Methods: The authors tested 10 patients with glaucoma and 10 age-matched normal volunteers with the Humphrey perimeter, first with program 24-2 and then with the method of constant stimuli to generate frequency of seeing curves. At two widely separated visual field locations on the program 24-2 grid, they presented stimuli in 2-dB intervals, 10 dB either side of the program 24-2 threshold, at 0 dB and 60 dB (15 repetitions per intensity). For the patients with glaucoma, they chose a visual field location with normal sensitivity and a location in an area of 10 to 20 dB loss.
Results: Analysis of variance with post hoc t-tests showed that reaction time (RT) at the 0-dB intensity was prolonged by approximately 90 msec in the abnormal sensitivity test location of patients with glaucoma compared to the control and the glaucoma normal sensitivity groups (P<0.0001). However, this difference was accounted for by only 4 of the 10 patients with glaucoma, reaching 100% of stimuli seen with the brightest stimulus at the moderately damaged test location. Reaction time at the frequency of seeing 50% estimated threshold showed no significant differences among the groups. Prolongation of RT from the 0-dB value was analyzed as a function of increasing attenuation of stimulus intensity. The results fit the equation RT = a + b(Intensity3) for all groups.
Conclusions: There is no significant difference in RT between normal subjects and patients with glaucoma either at threshold or to suprathreshold stimuli. Reaction time increases after a power function with increasing attenuation of stimulus intensity up to the threshold.
Similar articles
-
Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):426-35. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997. PMID: 9040476
-
Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Dec;34(13):3534-40. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993. PMID: 8258511
-
Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0135. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. PMID: 15980235
-
Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.Ophthalmology. 2005 May;112(5):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.051. Ophthalmology. 2005. PMID: 15878065
-
Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;40(3):648-56. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999. PMID: 10067968
Cited by
-
Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 14;5(6):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.13. eCollection 2016 Dec. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27980876 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 May 9;5(3):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.3.3. eCollection 2016 May. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27190698 Free PMC article.
-
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].Ophthalmologe. 2006 Mar;103(3):235-54. quiz 255-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1304-5. Ophthalmologe. 2006. PMID: 16496107 Review. German.
-
Response time and response time variability as indicators of response quality during static automated perimetry.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;260(3):927-935. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05349-z. Epub 2021 Sep 13. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34515839 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency-of-seeing curves (psychometric functions) for perimetric stimuli in age-related macular degeneration.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Jan;45(1):301-307. doi: 10.1111/opo.13396. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025. PMID: 39329222 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous