Similar articles

• NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System.

  Patten SF Jr, Lee JS, Nelson AC. Patten SF Jr, et al. Acta Cytol. 1996 Jan-Feb;40(1):45-52. doi: 10.1159/000333584. Acta Cytol. 1996. PMID: 8604574 Review. No abstract available.
• Roche Image Analysis Systems, Inc.

  Knesel EA Jr. Knesel EA Jr. Acta Cytol. 1996 Jan-Feb;40(1):60-6. doi: 10.1159/000333586. Acta Cytol. 1996. PMID: 8604576 No abstract available.
• Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.

  Jenny J, Isenegger I, Boon ME, Husain OA. Jenny J, et al. Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):82-7. doi: 10.1159/000332310. Acta Cytol. 1997. PMID: 9022731
• Evaluation of automated systems for the analysis of cervical smears.

  Coleman DV. Coleman DV. Cytopathology. 1998 Dec;9(6):359-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00150.x. Cytopathology. 1998. PMID: 9861528 No abstract available.
• Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.

  Kaminsky FC, Benneyan JC, Mullins DL. Kaminsky FC, et al. Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):209-23. doi: 10.1159/000332324. Acta Cytol. 1997. PMID: 9022745 Review.