Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Mar;86(3):332-40.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.3.332.

Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study

Affiliations

Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study

F M North et al. Am J Public Health. 1996 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Am J Public Health 1996 Aug;86(8 Pt 1):1093

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine the association between the psychosocial work environment and subsequent rates of sickness absence.

Methods: The analyses were based on a cohort of male and female British civil servants (n=9072). Rates of short spells (<or=7 days) and long spells (>7 days) of sickness absence were calculated for different aspects of the psychosocial work environment, as measured by self-reports and personnel managers' ratings (external assessments).

Results: Low levels of work demands, control, and support were associated with higher rates of short and long spells of absence in men and, to a lesser extent, in women. The differences were similar for the self-reports and external assessments. After adjustment for grade of employment, the differences were diminished but generally remained significant for short spells. The combination of high demands and low control was only associated with higher rates of short spells in the lower grades.

Conclusions: The psychosocial work environment predicts rates of sickness absence. Increased levels of control and support at work could have beneficial effects in terms of both improving the health and well-being of employees and increasing productivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1985;6:367-81 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(20):1497-503 - PubMed
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;14(3):378-88 - PubMed
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Mar;27(1):62-77 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1988 Feb;73(1):11-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources