A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy

Abstract

Objective: To compare short term clinical results in a prospective randomised trial of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

Methods: One hundred and forty-three women scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy, with or without salpingo-oophorectomy and with a maximum uterine width of less than ll cm, were prospectively randomised to undergo the procedure by laparoscopic hysterectomy (n = 71) or abdominal hysterectomy (n = 72). During laparoscopic hysterectomy, the uterine arteries as well as the upper portion of the cardinal ligaments were transected laparoscopically. The perioperative and post-operative courses of the groups were compared.

Results: The number of women with a complication did not differ significantly between laparoscopic hysterectomy (27%) and abdominal hysterectomy (33%) groups. The post-operative fall in erythrocyte volume fraction was significantly greater following abdominal hysterectomy (5.6% compared with 4.1% median value, P < 0.001). Post operative pain, assessed by the patients two days after surgery on a visual analogue scale, was significantly higher following abdominal hysterectomy (4.2 compared with 3.6 units median value, P < 0.05). Although laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer (148 min compared with 85 min median value, P < 0.001), the women undergoing this procedure had a shorter post-operative time in hospital (two compared with four days median value, P < 0.001) and a shorter convalescence (16 compared with 35 days median value, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe procedure for selected patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy, and offers benefits to the patients in the form of less operative bleeding, less post-operative pain, shorter time in hospital and shorter convalescence time.