Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 May;133(5):562-8.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90008-3.

Cuffed endotracheal tubes: mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flow

Cuffed endotracheal tubes: mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flow

P Dobrin et al. Am J Surg. 1977 May.

Abstract

Eighteen brands of cuffed endotracheal tubes, including those with the new low pressure cuffs, were evaluated and compared. Experiments were performed in vitro on excised dog tracheae to measure the mucosal pressure exerted by the inflated cuffs. Pressure was measured directly with a mechanical sensor. Latex cuffs exerted the highest mucosal pressures, whereas silicone cuffs exerted the lowest mucosal pressures. Polyvinyl chloride cuffs exerted intermediate levels of mucosal pressure. With each material, predistended cuffs exerted lower mucosal pressures than nonpredistended cuffs. A second set of experiments was performed in vivo to determine the effect of mucosal pressure on tracheal wall blood flow. These studies employed a thermistor technic. The data showed that, when inflated sufficiently to seal within the trachea, stiff cuffs reduced blood flow more than compliant cuffs. With all cuffs, blood flow was reduced more at the mucosa than at deeper regions of the tracheal wall.It was concluded that for clinical use, compliant cuffs are preferable to stiff cuffs because they should cause less ischemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources