The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status
- PMID: 8608457
The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status
Abstract
Background: High pressure gradients occurring through normally functioning prosthetic valves appear to be related to a mismatch between the effective orifice area of the prosthesis and the patient's body surface area.
Objective: To determine whether prosthesis-patient mismatch affects clinical and hemodynamic status, a group of patients with a bioprosthetic heart valve in the aortic position was prospectively evaluated at 6.2+/-4.4 years after implantation by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Methods: Manufacturer-derived in vitro valve areas were available in 61 patients allowing classification into two subgroups, with or without mismatch, based on a valve area at implantation indexed for body surface area 0.85 cm2/m2 or less, or greater than 0.85 cm2/m2. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters evaluated at follow-up included New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution, mean transprosthetic gradient, prosthetic valve area and cardiac index.
Results: Prosthesis-patient mismatch was present in 32 of 61 patients (52%). Although NYHA class of the patients was similar in both groups, hemo-dynamic performance of the aortic bioprostheses was worse in patients with mismatch than in patients with no mismatch, as indicated by a higher mean gradient (22+/-9 versus 15+/-8 mm Hg, P=0.002) and a lower cardiac index (3.0+/-0.7 versus 3.4+/-0.7 L/min/m2, P=0.04). The prevalence and severity of intrinsic prosthetic dysfunction were similar in both groups. Despite similar NYHA functional class distribution in both groups, the occurrence of syncope, acute pulmonary edema and angina pectoris was significantly higher in patients with mismatch (50% versus 21%, P=0.017).
Conclusions: Prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated with worse hemodynamic performance and higher prevalence of adverse clinical events. However, mismatch did not promote accelerated hemodynamic or structural deterioration of the bioprosthesis.
Similar articles
-
Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve.J Heart Valve Dis. 1998 Mar;7(2):211-8. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998. PMID: 9587864
-
Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6 Suppl 1:S34-7; discussion S38. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992. PMID: 1389276
-
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Feb;81(2):481-8; discussion 489. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.084. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16427836
-
Manufacturer-provided effective orifice area index charts and the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch.J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 Jan;21(1):107-11. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012. PMID: 22474751 Review.
-
Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1131-41. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00859-7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 11028462 Review.
Cited by
-
Time-frequency analysis of heart murmurs. Part I: Parametric modelling and numerical simulations.Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997 Sep;35(5):474-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02525526. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997. PMID: 9374050
-
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.Heart. 2006 Aug;92(8):1022-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363. Epub 2005 Oct 26. Heart. 2006. PMID: 16251232 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early and late outcomes of AVR with aortic annular enlargement in octogenarian.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;63(8):453-8. doi: 10.1007/s11748-015-0559-2. Epub 2015 May 14. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25971236
-
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Nov;18(11):67. doi: 10.1007/s11936-016-0488-0. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016. PMID: 27687067 Review.
-
The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement.Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;51(3):161-166. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.3.161. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29854659 Free PMC article.