Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Dec;173(6):1812-5.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90432-8.

Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis

G N Schaer et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to determine and compare the total annual costs for reusable and single-use laparoscopic instruments.

Study design: Records were kept over a 12-month period of all laparoscopic operations (performed only with reusable instrumentation), the surgical instruments used, depreciation costs, and all associated expenses (repairs, maintenance, replacements, cleaning, sterilization, wages). The total cost was then calculated and compared with the total cost (purchase price plus disposal fees) that single-use instruments would have caused for the same operations.

Results: The total cost for single-use instruments would have been more than seven times that for reusable instruments.

Conclusion: We have decided to continue using reusable instruments for most of our laparoscopic operations. However, single-use instruments are used in situations in which they present a definite advantage. A proper balance is thus sought between the importance of cost factors, on the one hand, and the recognition of the need for the best instrument available for certain procedures, on the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources