Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality
- PMID: 8612832
- DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58284-3
Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether geographic variations in sperm counts might bias conclusions drawn from studies of semen quality.
Design: Reanalysis of published data from a meta-analysis of 61 studies from 1938 to 1990 that concluded a worldwide decline in semen quality over the last 50 years.
Main outcome measures: Influence of geographic location on sperm counts.
Results: Of 61 studies in the meta-analysis, only 20 included > or = 100 men. These 20 studies collectively comprised 91% of the total men studied. We focused our reanalysis on these 20 studies. Of the studies before 1970, all were from the United States and 80% were from New York. These studies represented locations with the highest sperm counts. In contrast, after 1970, 80% of the studies were from locations not represented earlier, including five studies from third world countries, where sperm counts were low.
Conclusions: Sperm counts vary dramatically among different geographic locations.
Comment in
-
"The debate continues"--the continuing debate over the possible decline in semen quality.Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):909-11. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58258-2. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8612846 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
