"The debate continues"--the continuing debate over the possible decline in semen quality

Free article

Editorial

L I Lipshultz. Fertil Steril. 1996 May.

Free article

. 1996 May;65(5):909-11.

doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58258-2.

No abstract available

Comment on

Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality.
Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH. Fisch H, et al. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58278-8. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8612826
Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform.
Paulsen CA, Berman NG, Wang C. Paulsen CA, et al. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1015-20. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8612827
Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality.
Fisch H, Goluboff ET. Fisch H, et al. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1044-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58284-3. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8612832
Pregnancy outcome after early amniotic fluid leakage after transabdominal multifetal reduction.
Lipitz S, Grisaru D, Achiron R, Lidor A, Mashiach S, Schiff E. Lipitz S, et al. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1055-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58287-9. Fertil Steril. 1996. PMID: 8612835