Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Apr;27(4):622-4.
doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.4.622.

Recurrent spontaneous arterial dissections: risk in familial versus nonfamilial disease

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Recurrent spontaneous arterial dissections: risk in familial versus nonfamilial disease

W I Schievink et al. Stroke. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Among patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissections, the risk of recurrent arterial dissection is relatively low at 1% per year, but this risk may be higher for patients with a family history of arterial dissections. We compared the risk of a recurrent arterial dissection in patients with familial versus non familial disease.

Methods: Long-term follow-up was established in 200 patients (104 women and 96 men with a mean age of 44.9 years) with spontaneous cervical artery dissections evaluated at a single institution between 1970 and 1990.

Results: Among the 200 patients, 10 (5%) were identified who had a family history of spontaneous arterial dissections. In a multivariate analysis, family history was the only significant variable associated with the risk of recurrent dissection (X2=15.51; P=.0001). A recurrent arterial dissection was identified in 5 (50%) of the 10 patients with familial disease compared with 11 (5.8%) of the 190 patients with nonfamilial disease, with an estimated relative risk of 6.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 18.3; P=.0007).

Conclusions: Among patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissections, a family history of arterial dissection is an important risk factor for the development of a recurrent arterial dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types