This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 1996 Apr;174(4):1395-6.

doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70697-x.

Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: which method is superior

H F Sandmire, R K DeMott

PMID: 8623879
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70697-x

Comment

Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: which method is superior

H F Sandmire et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr.

. 1996 Apr;174(4):1395-6.

doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70697-x.

Authors

H F Sandmire, R K DeMott

PMID: 8623879
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70697-x

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth.
Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA. Vintzileos AM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;173(4):1021-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91320-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7485287 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.