Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation
- PMID: 8628872
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628872
Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the sensitivities of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for detection and characterization of surgically verified small renal lesions.
Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease or hereditary papillary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses were removed (92% were <3 cm). Detection rates and accuracy of CT and US in the characterization of renal morphology were correlated with lesion size.
Results: CT and US detection rates for lesions of 0-5 mm were respectively 47% and 0%; 5-10 mm, 60% and 21%; 10-15 mm, 75% and 28%; 15-20 mm, 100% and 58%; 20-25 mm, 100% and 79%; and 25-30 mm, 100% and 100%. Among the lesions 10-35 mm, 80% and 82% were correctly characterized with CT and US, respectively.
Conclusion: A substantial proportion of lesions under 1 cm were not detected with either modality. Neither CT nor US was superior in the characterization of lesions 3 cm or less. CT and particularly US screening studies in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease should be interpreted cautiously because missed or mischaracterized small renal lesions are a frequent problem in these patients.
Comment in
-
Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses.Radiology. 1996 Mar;198(3):638-41. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628846. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8628846 No abstract available.
-
Suggestions with regard to radiologic "numeracy".Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):877-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.877-b. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8939246 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
