Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Jan-Feb;9(1):38-45.

Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement

  • PMID: 8630176
Review

Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement

G F Priest. Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Failure rates of traditional fixed partial dentures, resin-bonded prostheses, and implant restorations for the replacement of a single missing tooth are compared in this literature review. A lack of documented longevity studies involving conventional fixed partial dentures makes failure rates difficult to determine. Reported failures ranged from only 3% over 23 years to 20% over 3 years. The major causes of loss were caries and endodontically and periodontally related complications. Research concerning resin-bonded fixed partial dentures was more prevalent, but indicated that overall retention of these prostheses may be unpredictable. Failure rates were quite divergent, ranging from 10% over 11 years to 54% over 11 months. Debonding was the usual cause of failure. Clinical reports of single-tooth implant replacements have followed stricter protocols than the other two alternatives. Short-term studies indicated favorable success rates for these restorations, but these must be confirmed by long-term evaluations. Failures ranged from 9% over 3 years to 0% over 6.6 years. These comparisons should be considered in treatment planning a restoration for the replacement of a single missing tooth.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms