A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia
- PMID: 8634416
A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia
Abstract
High-dose cytarabine (ara-c) may overcome cytarabine resistance in leukemic blasts. It has been used as a successful salvage and in postremission therapy but not as initial induction treatment. Patients aged 15 to 60 years, presenting with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were randomized to receive either high-dose cytarabine, 3 g/m2 12 hourly on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 for 8 doses, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 days 1 to 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7, (HIDAC-3-7) or standard dose cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days with daunorubicin and etoposide at the same dose and schedule as above (7-3-7). Patients could receive a second or third induction course if complete remission (CR) was not achieved. All patients received the same postinduction consolidation therapy (5-2-5) for 2 courses. Eligible patients had no prior chemotherapy or myelodysplastic disease. Patients have been followed for a median of 4.5 years. Of 301 patients treated, complete response (CR) was achieved in 71% with HIDAC-3-7 and 74% with 7-3-7. For patients in CR, the estimated median remission duration was 45 months with HIDAC-3-7 and 12 months with 7-3-7 (P = .0005 univariate analysis, P = .0004 multivariate analysis). The estimated percentage of patients relapse free 5 years after achieving a CR was 49% on HIDAC-3-7 and 24% on 7-3-7. Patients in CR tended to survive longer with HIDAC-3-7 but there were no overall survival differences between the two arms. HIDAC-3-7 was associated with significantly more toxicity in induction with more leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting and eye toxicity (all P < .001) but a similar incidence of severe central nervous system and cerebellar toxicity compared to 7-3-7. The consolidation treatment was the same in both arms but caused significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients previously treated with HIDAC-3-7 induction (P < .0001). We conclude that a dose-effect exists for cytarabine in AML and that HIDAC-3-7 prolongs remission duration and disease-free survival and is tolerable when used as initial induction therapy in patients with de novo AML.
Comment in
-
High-dose cytarabine induction for acute myeloid leukemia.Blood. 1996 Jul 15;88(2):754-5. Blood. 1996. PMID: 8695826 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study.Blood. 1996 Oct 15;88(8):2841-51. Blood. 1996. PMID: 8874180 Clinical Trial.
-
A phase I/II study of intensive dose escalation of cytarabine in combination with idarubicin and etoposide in induction and consolidation treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia. Australian Leukaemia Study Group (ALSG).Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Aug;34(5-6):501-10. doi: 10.3109/10428199909058477. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999. PMID: 10492073 Clinical Trial.
-
Multicenter randomized phase II trial of idarubicin vs mitoxantrone, combined with VP-16 and cytarabine for induction/consolidation therapy, followed by a feasibility study of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia. 1999 Jun;13(6):843-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401445. Leukemia. 1999. PMID: 10360370 Clinical Trial.
-
Intensified induction chemotherapy with high dose cytarabine and etoposide for acute myeloid leukemia: a review and updated results of the Australian Leukemia Study Group.Leuk Lymphoma. 1998 Jan;28(3-4):315-27. doi: 10.3109/10428199809092687. Leuk Lymphoma. 1998. PMID: 9517503 Review.
-
High-dose cytarabine (24 g/m2) in combination with idarubicin (HiDAC-3) results in high first-cycle response with limited gastrointestinal toxicity in adult acute myeloid leukaemia.Intern Med J. 2013 Mar;43(3):294-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02868.x. Intern Med J. 2013. PMID: 22757980 Review.
Cited by
-
What Is the Optimal Induction Therapy for Younger Fit Patients With AML?Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016 Oct;11(5):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s11899-016-0339-9. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016. PMID: 27475430 Review.
-
Upfront therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):361-70. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0184-x. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011. PMID: 21725902 Review.
-
Clinical management of primary non-acute promyelocytic leukemia acute myeloid leukemia: Practice Guidelines by the Italian Society of Hematology, the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, and the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation.Haematologica. 2009 Jan;94(1):102-12. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13166. Epub 2008 Nov 10. Haematologica. 2009. PMID: 19001282 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines on the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular: Project guidelines: Associação Médica Brasileira - 2015.Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):58-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 5. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016. PMID: 26969776 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of the effects of early intensified induction chemotherapy and standard 3+7 chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Blood Res. 2017 Sep;52(3):174-183. doi: 10.5045/br.2017.52.3.174. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Blood Res. 2017. PMID: 29043232 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical