Combined administration of levonorgestrel and testosterone induces more rapid and effective suppression of spermatogenesis than testosterone alone: a promising male contraceptive approach
- PMID: 8636300
- DOI: 10.1210/jcem.81.2.8636300
Combined administration of levonorgestrel and testosterone induces more rapid and effective suppression of spermatogenesis than testosterone alone: a promising male contraceptive approach
Abstract
Studies using high dose testosterone (T) administration in normal men as a male contraceptive have resulted in azoospermia rates of only 50-70%. Previous studies of T and progestogen combinations have shown comparable rates of azoospermia, but have been uncontrolled or used T in doses less than that associated with maximal suppression of sperm production. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, single blind trial comparing 6 months of T enanthate administration (100 mg, im, weekly) with the same dose of T enanthate in conjunction with the progestogen levonorgestrel (LNG; 500 micrograms, orally, daily) in 36 normal men, aged 20-42 yr (n = 18 in each group). The primary end points were induction of azoospermia or severe oligospermia (< 3 million sperm/mL). The combination of T plus LNG was much more effective in suppressing sperm production than T alone. Sixty-seven percent of the T plus LNG group (12 of 18) and 33% of the T alone group (6 of 18) achieved azoospermia by 6 months (P = 0.06). Severe oligospermia or azoospermia developed in 94% of the T plus LNG (17 of 18) group compared to 61% of the T alone group (11 of 18; P < 0.05). T plus LNG also suppressed sperm production more rapidly than T alone. Time to azoospermia was 9.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 15.3 +/- 1.9 weeks in the T plus LNG and T alone groups, respectively (mean +/- SEM; P < 0.05). Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased 21.7 +/- 3.6% in men given T plus LNG (P < 0.05), compared to only a 1.8 +/- 3.8% decrease in men in the T alone group. Average weight gain was 5.3 +/- 0.8 kg in the T plus LNG group and 2.3 +/- 0.9 kg in the T alone group (P < 0.05). Acne and increase in hemoglobin were similar in the two groups. We conclude that combination hormonal therapy with T plus a progestogen might offer a reversible male contraceptive approach with a more rapid onset of action and more reliable induction of both azoospermia and severe oligospermia than T alone.
PIP: In Washington State, 36 men aged 20-42 years were randomly allocated to either the group receiving intramuscular injection of 100 mg/week testosterone (T) enanthate alone or to the group receiving the same dose T plus oral 500 mcg/day levonorgestrel (LNG). This 6-month, placebo-controlled, single blind trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of both regimes in suppressing sperm production. The combination of T plus LNG was more likely than T alone to achieve severe oligospermia or azoospermia in 6 months (94% vs. 61%; p .05). It also achieved azoospermia more quickly than T alone (9.9 vs. 15.3 weeks; p .05). Men in the T plus LNG group experienced greater reduction in serum high density lipoprotein than those in the T alone group (21.7% vs. 1.8%; p .05). They also gained more weight than those in the T alone group (5.3 vs. 2.3 kg; p .05). The two groups experienced a similar rate for acne and increase in hemoglobin. The increase in hemoglobin was significant for both groups. In conclusion, T plus LNG treatment over a 6-month period is a more effective and quicker acting method than T alone for suppressing sperm production to levels low enough to prevent pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Intramuscular testosterone enanthate plus very low dosage oral levonorgestrel suppresses spermatogenesis without causing weight gain in normal young men: a randomized clinical trial.J Androl. 2005 May-Jun;26(3):405-13. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.04135. J Androl. 2005. PMID: 15867009 Clinical Trial.
-
A lower dosage levonorgestrel and testosterone combination effectively suppresses spermatogenesis and circulating gonadotropin levels with fewer metabolic effects than higher dosage combinations.J Androl. 1999 May-Jun;20(3):407-14. J Androl. 1999. PMID: 10386821 Clinical Trial.
-
Establishing the minimum effective dose and additive effects of depot progestin in suppression of human spermatogenesis by a testosterone depot.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Nov;81(11):4113-21. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.11.8923869. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996. PMID: 8923869 Clinical Trial.
-
Testosterone/progestin regimens: a realistic option for male contraception?Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2004 Oct;5(10):1025-30. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15535423 Review.
-
Developments in the control of testicular function.Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992 Apr;6(2):451-83. doi: 10.1016/s0950-351x(05)80158-2. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992. PMID: 1377467 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Novel Oral Androgen 11β-Methyl-19-Nortestosterone-17β-Dodecylcarbonate in Men.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Mar 1;104(3):629-638. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01528. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019. PMID: 30252057 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hormonal approaches to male contraception.Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Nov;20(6):520-4. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833f1b4a. Curr Opin Urol. 2010. PMID: 20808223 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Steroid hormones for contraception in men.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004316.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419294 Free PMC article.
-
Male contraception.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Aug;28(6):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jun 5. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014. PMID: 24947599 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Male hormonal contraception: potential risks and benefits.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2011 Jun;12(2):107-17. doi: 10.1007/s11154-011-9183-3. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2011. PMID: 21547529 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical