Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Mar;61(3):214-7.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199603)61:3<214::AID-JSO10>3.0.CO;2-7.

Comparative analysis of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer

R Y Chandawarkar et al. J Surg Oncol. 1996 Mar.

Abstract

Preoperative radiological findings of nodal status in 74 patients, using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were compared to histopathology reports following transthoracic total esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy (TTE), involving complete dissection of the mediastinal and abdominal nodes and lower cervical lymph nodes. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each radiological investigation were calculated for each anatomic group of nodes. Statistical analysis revealed that EUS is more accurate and significantly more sensitive (P<0.01) for lymph nodes along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve and those in the upper and mid-periesophageal, infracarinal locations. Paratracheal and lower paraesophageal nodes are assessed better using CT whereas MRI is better for mid-paraesophageal and infra-aortic nodes. US is most accurate and sensitive for evaluation of cervical and abdominal nodes (P<0.01).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources