Value of dynamic respiratory changes in left and right ventricular pressures for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis
- PMID: 8640975
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.2007
Value of dynamic respiratory changes in left and right ventricular pressures for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis
Abstract
Background: Conventional cardiac catheterization criteria for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (CP) rely on equalization of intracardiac pressures and have many recognized limitations. Recently, Doppler echocardiographic methods have been used to examine dynamic respiratory changes of increased ventricular interdependence and dissociation of intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures for the diagnosis of CP. These pathophysiological features may be best delineated by cardiac catheterization. Therefore, we studied the accuracy of these dynamic respiratory changes in left ventricular and right ventricular pressure for the diagnosis of CP at cardiac catheterization.
Methods and results: High-fidelity manometric catheters and respirometry were used to study 36 patients: 15 patients with surgically proven CP (group 1) and 21 patients with other causes of heart failure (group 2). Conventional cardiac catheterization variables used to establish the diagnosis of CP lacked sensitivity and specificity and failed to distinguish between these groups. However, the finding of discordance between right ventricular and left ventricular pressures during inspiration, a sign of increased ventricular interdependence, accurately distinguished patients in group 1 from those in group 2 (P < .05).
Conclusions: Examination of dynamic respiratory changes indicating increased ventricular interdependence may be helpful in the diagnosis of CP in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Similar articles
-
Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.039. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18206742 Clinical Trial.
-
Differentiation of tricuspid regurgitation from constrictive pericarditis: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.Heart. 2009 Sep;95(17):1449-54. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.155523. Epub 2009 May 17. Heart. 2009. PMID: 19451139
-
Doppler evaluation of patients with constrictive pericarditis: use of tricuspid regurgitation velocity curves to determine enhanced ventricular interaction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Sep;28(3):652-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00198-2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8772752
-
Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics.Am Heart J. 1999 Aug;138(2 Pt 1):219-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70105-5. Am Heart J. 1999. PMID: 10426832 Review.
-
Pathophysiology of the Pericardium.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan-Feb;59(4):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017. PMID: 27916673 Review.
Cited by
-
A case of recurrent pericardial constriction presenting with severe pulmonary hypertension.Pulm Circ. 2013 Apr;3(2):436-9. doi: 10.4103/2045-8932.114780. Pulm Circ. 2013. PMID: 24015347 Free PMC article.
-
Pericardial disease: diagnosis and management.Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jun;85(6):572-93. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0046. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010. PMID: 20511488 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of constrictive pericarditis in the 21st century.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Dec;9(6):436-42. doi: 10.1007/s11936-007-0038-x. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 18221595
-
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 May 4;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-14. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009. PMID: 19413898 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Jul;21(7):339-45. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19571346 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous