Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1996 Jan;15(1):65-70.
doi: 10.1007/BF01586187.

Gender differences in local and systemic reactions to inactivated influenza vaccine, established by a meta-analysis of fourteen independent studies

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Gender differences in local and systemic reactions to inactivated influenza vaccine, established by a meta-analysis of fourteen independent studies

W E Beyer et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

In order to determine whether there is a difference between genders in reported adverse reactions to inactivated influenza vaccine, a computerized database of serological studies was investigated. A standardized questionnaire was used to evaluate vaccine reactogenicity. A total of 1,800 vaccinees in 14 studies were analyzed separately for two age groups ( < 60 and > or = 60 years of age). Females reported significantly more local reactions than males. The pooled odds ratio for the outcome measure "any local reaction" was 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.40, significant) and 0.54 (95% Cl, 0.41-0.70, significant) for young and elderly adults, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the outcome measure "any systemic reaction." Previous exposure to influenza or influenza vaccine had no influence on reactogenicity. There were no gender differences in sero-responses. In conclusion, gender should be regarded as a predictor of reported reactions to influenza vaccine in both young and elderly adults and should be addressed in future study designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biol Stand. 1979 Apr;7(2):123-36 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4):737-47 - PubMed
    1. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;27(5):335-71 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Feb;94(1):87-95 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Feb;94(1):97-109 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources