[Evaluation of intravenous ranitidine and omeprazole effect on the 24-hour gastric ph-metry in duodenal ulcer hemorrhage]
- PMID: 8645512
[Evaluation of intravenous ranitidine and omeprazole effect on the 24-hour gastric ph-metry in duodenal ulcer hemorrhage]
Abstract
Background: The pharmacotherapy of bleeding peptic ulcer is directed to improve the environment of the bleeding point by keeping the gastric pH above the proteolytic range for pepsin.
Objective: To evaluate the best pharmacological approach to inhibit gastric acid secretion with current antisecretory drugs in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers.
Methods: Forty-seven patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers were randomized to receive I.V.: I) Omeprazole: an initial bolus of 80 mg + perfusion of 3.3 mg/h; II) Omeprazole: an initial bolus of 80 mg + 40 mg/12 h; III) Omeprazole: 40 mg/8 h; IV) Ranitidine: perfusion of 12.5 mg/h; V) Ranitidine: 50 mg/4 h. Gastric acidity was measured and recorded by 24 h gastric pH monitoring.
Results: All types of treatment with omeprazole were superior to either continuous perfusion or intermittent bolus of ranitidine in increasing the pH for 24 h and reducing the % of time the gastric pH was below 4 and 6, and the number of time the gastric pH was below 4 for more than 5 min. There were no statistical differences between the different regimens of omeprazole, but continuous perfusion of ranitidine was superior to intermittent ranitidine bolus.
Conclusions: Parenteral omeprazole is better than parenteral ranitidine in keeping the intragastric pH above the proteolytic range for pepsin in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers.