Cytogenetic findings in 175 patients indicate that items of the Kiel classification should not be disregarded in the REAL classification of lymphoid neoplasms
- PMID: 8645741
- DOI: 10.1007/s002770050175
Cytogenetic findings in 175 patients indicate that items of the Kiel classification should not be disregarded in the REAL classification of lymphoid neoplasms
Abstract
Cytogenetics have proved to be a valuable tool for classifying systemic lymphatic neoplasms, as this technique allows different stem line aberrations and clonal developments to be distinguished. This study was designed to analyze how far groups defined according to common cytogenetic features correlated with their position in either the Kiel (KC) or the REAL classification. Cytogenetic analyses were performed on material from 175 patients with lymphoid neoplasms (LN). Samples were prepared from peripheral blood and bone marrow in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), from bone marrow in multiple myeloma (MM), and from lymph node biopsies in lymphomas. The results of this study support the inclusion of ALL, MM, and extranodal lymphomas into a comprehensive classification, because their chromosomal aberrations were always characteristic for LN. From the cytogenetic point of view, a subgroup of ALL appears as a leukemic manifestation of lymphoblastic lymphoma. MM have structural aberrations of chromosomes 1, 11, and 14 and secondary aberrations of chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 12, 13, and 18, all of which are characteristic for lymphatic disease. The groups with follicle center cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma correlate well with our results both in the low-grade subtype and in the blastic variant type, the majority of cases demonstrating t(14; 18) and its variants and t(11; 14), respectively. In contrast, the group of diffuse large B-cell (DLB) lymphomas proved to be heterogeneous on the basis of our cytogenetic results. Accordingly, we would suggest keeping the immunoblastic lymphoma (IB) subtype defined by the KC. IB demonstrates no stem line aberration in common with any other group and seems to be characterized by stem line aberrations involving chromosomes 3 and 6. As some DLB lymphomas have a t(14;18) or variant translocations involving chromosome 18, they should either be separated as a subgroup or included into the group of follicle center lymphomas.
Similar articles
-
Spectral karyotyping and interphase FISH reveal abnormalities not detected by conventional G-banding. Implications for treatment stratification of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: detailed analysis of 70 cases.Eur J Haematol. 2002 Jan;68(1):31-41. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.00547.x. Eur J Haematol. 2002. PMID: 11952819
-
Cytogenetics with flow cytometry in lymph node/extranodal tissue biopsies is sensitive to assist the early diagnosis of suspected lymphomas.Ann Hematol. 2017 Oct;96(10):1673-1680. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3066-y. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Ann Hematol. 2017. PMID: 28744576
-
Chromosomal changes detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Sep;116(9):1298-303. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003. PMID: 14527352
-
Familial multiple myeloma: a family study and review of the literature.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Oct 3;93(19):1479-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.19.1479. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001. PMID: 11584064 Review.
-
A new B-cell line showing a complex translocation (8;14;18) and BCL2 rearrangement.Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994 Jun;74(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(94)90003-5. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994. PMID: 8019967 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials