Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Feb;21(1):28-36.

[Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8647577
Review

[Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation]

[Article in German]
A Mügge. Herz. 1996 Feb.

Abstract

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is a frequent finding in elderly patients; the risk of thromboembolic complications is comparable to that reported in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Recently, 6 multicenter clinical trials (5 primary prevention, 1 secondary prevention trail) have been published which demonstrate equivocally that oral anticoagulation therapy significantly reduces the embolic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by about 67% to 87%. The target INR of anticoagulation with warfarin in 2 of these trials was 1.4 to 2.8 ("low-dose" warfarin); interestingly, the magnitude of risk reduction was similar to these 2 studies with "low-dose" warfarin as it has been reported by the others using full-dose warfarin with an INR target between 2.0 and 4.5. Side effects of oral anticoagulation (severe bleeding complications) were low in these trials. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio in these 6 clinical trials encourage the use of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It will be a challenge to transfer these results to clinical practice, and to define in more detail the risk-benefit ratios for subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation, e.g. patients > 75 years of age, or patients with "lone" or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. It is well established that patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing medical or DC-cardioversion are at risk for thromboembolic complications. In previous studies, this risk appears to be in the range of 2% without concomitant anticoagulation, but only 0.33% in those patients with concomitant anticoagulation. Thus, it is widely accepted that patients should be anticoagulated for at least 2 weeks prior and after planned cardioversion. Recently, an alternative concept has been proposed omitting anticoagulation before cardioversion; instead, transesophageal echocardiography is used to exclude intracardiac thrombi. Because it is known that mechanical function of the left atrium and appendage is still impaired after cardioversion, this concept of echocardiographic-guided cardioversion does not assign the necessity of anticoagulation at the day of cardioversion, and 2 weeks afterwards. The safety aspects of this concept of echocardiographic-guided cardioversion is under current investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources