Segregation of DNA polynucleotide strands into sister chromatids and the use of endoreduplicated cells to track sister chromatid exchanges induced by crosslinks, alkylations, or x-ray damage
- PMID: 8650167
- PMCID: PMC39135
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5765
Segregation of DNA polynucleotide strands into sister chromatids and the use of endoreduplicated cells to track sister chromatid exchanges induced by crosslinks, alkylations, or x-ray damage
Abstract
The method of Matsumoto and Ohta [Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1992) Chromosoma 102, 60-65; Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1995) Mutat. Res. 326, 93-98] to induce large numbers of endoreduplicated Chinese hamster ovary cells has now been coupled with the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa method of Perry and Wolff [Perry, P. & Wolff, S. (1974) Nature (London) 251, 156-158] to produce harlequin endoreduplicated chromosomes that after the third round of DNA replication are composed of a chromosome with a light chromatid and a dark chromatid in close apposition to its sister chromosome containing two light chromatids. Unless the pattern is disrupted by sister chromatid exchange (SCE), the dark chromatid is always in the center, so that the order of the chromatids is light-dark light-light. The advent of this method, which permits the observation of SCEs in endoreduplicated cells, makes it possible to determine with great ease in which cell cycle an SCE occurred. This now allows us to approach several vexing questions about the induction of SCEs (genetic damage and its repair) after exposure to various types of mutagenic carcinogens. The present experiments have allowed us to observe how many cell cycles various types of lesions that are induced in DNA by a crosslinking agent, an alkylating agent, or ionizing radiation, and that are responsible for the induction of SCEs, persist before being repaired and thus lose their ability to inflict genetic damage. Other experiments with various types of mutagenic carcinogens and various types of cell lines that have defects in different DNA repair processes, such as mismatch repair, excision repair, crosslink repair, and DNA-strand-break repair, can now be carried out to determine the role of these types of repair in removing specific types of lesions.
Similar articles
-
Cytogenetical characterization of Chinese hamster ovary X-ray-sensitive mutant cells xrs 5 and xrs 6. III. Induction of cell killing, chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges by bleomycin, mono- and bi-functional alkylating agents.Mutat Res. 1989 Jun;212(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90063-8. Mutat Res. 1989. PMID: 2471928
-
Cytogenetical characterization of Chinese hamster ovary X-ray-sensitive mutant cells, xrs 5 and xrs 6. IV. Study of chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges by restriction endonucleases and inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II.Mutat Res. 1989 Jun;212(2):137-48. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90064-x. Mutat Res. 1989. PMID: 2543922
-
A path probability model for sister-chromatid exchanges induced by alkylating agents.Mutat Res. 1984 Mar;126(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(84)90167-2. Mutat Res. 1984. PMID: 6700613
-
Insights into the mechanisms of sister chromatid exchange formation.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):304-9. doi: 10.1159/000077507. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004. PMID: 15162056 Review.
-
Mechanisms and consequences of methylating agent-induced SCEs and chromosomal aberrations: a long road traveled and still a far way to go.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):77-86. doi: 10.1159/000077469. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004. PMID: 15162018 Review.
Cited by
-
The diplochromosome of endoreduplicated cells: a new approach to highlight the mechanism of sister chromatid exchange.Chromosoma. 1996 Jul;105(1):50-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02510038. Chromosoma. 1996. PMID: 8662258
-
Cilostazol geno-protective effects mitigate carbamazepine-induced genotoxicity in human cultured blood lymphocytes.Toxicol Rep. 2024 Nov 17;13:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101814. eCollection 2024 Dec. Toxicol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39654995 Free PMC article.
-
X-irradiation of G1 CHO cells induces SCE which are both true and false in BrdU-substituted cells but only false in biotin-dUTP-substituted cells.Chromosome Res. 1999;7(4):277-88. doi: 10.1023/a:1009226930759. Chromosome Res. 1999. PMID: 10461873
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources