Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Apr 1;77(9):696-700.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89202-8.

Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation

H Daida et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

To investigate the improvement in exercise capacity of transplant patients after an early postoperative (phase II) cardiac rehabilitation program during the first year after surgery, we analyzed retrospectively exercise capacity within 3 months (at the completion of phase II rehabilitation) and 1 year after surgery in 17 orthotopic heart transplantation patients (15 men and 2 women) and 17 age- and gender-matched coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. All patients participated in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise program followed by a home-based exercise program. At the completion of phase II cardiac rehabilitation, mean peak oxygen (VO2) adjusted for body weight in heart transplant patients was not significantly different from that in CABG patients (19.7 +/- 3.7 vs 21.9 +/- 4.1 ml/kg/min), and oxygen pulse at peak exercise did not differ between the 2 groups (11.5 +/- 2.5 vs 12.6 +/- 2.4 ml/beat). Between 3 months and 1 year after surgery, CABG patients had a marked increase in exercise time, increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise (heart rate reserve), peak VO2, and oxygen pulse. In contrast, heart transplant patients had a significant but only modest increase in peak VO2, and were much more limited in exercise capacity at 1 year than were CABG patients (21.3 +/- 3.9 vs 27.4 +/- 4.7 ml/kg/min, p <0.0001). In our limited patient population, usual phase I rehabilitation with subsequent home-based exercise training was inadequate to improve the exercise capacity of heart transplant patients, and different rehabilitation protocols, such as long-term supervised exercise training, specific to this patient group may be indicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources