Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies
- PMID: 8656904
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90806-5
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. FINDINGS The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95 percent CI] in current users 1.24 [1.15-1.33], 2p<0.00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1.16 [1.08-1.23], 2p=0.00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1.07 [1.02-1.13], 2p=0.009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1.01 [0.96-1.05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0.88 (0.81-0.95; 2p=0.002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90 percent of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0.5 (95 percent CI 0.3-0.7), 1.5 (0.7-2.3), and 4.7 (2.7-6.7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons...
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1996 Nov-Dec;125(3):77
-
Pill scares and public responsibility.Lancet. 1996 Jun 22;347(9017):1707. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8656897 No abstract available.
-
Breast cancer and hormone exposure.Lancet. 1996 Sep 7;348(9028):682; author reply 683. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65103-3. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8782768 No abstract available.
-
Breast cancer and hormone exposure.Lancet. 1996 Sep 7;348(9028):682-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65104-5. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8782769 No abstract available.
-
Dangers of suppressing menstruation.Lancet. 2000 Aug 5;356(9228):513-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74189-1. Lancet. 2000. PMID: 10981923 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3 Suppl):1S-106S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0. Contraception. 1996. PMID: 8899264 Review.
-
Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.Lancet. 1997 Oct 11;350(9084):1047-59. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 10213546
-
Breast cancer among young U.S. women in relation to oral contraceptive use.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 6;86(7):505-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.7.505. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994. PMID: 8133534
-
Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among younger women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Jun 7;87(11):827-35. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.11.827. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995. PMID: 7791232
-
Breast cancer risk: perception versus reality.Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):25S-28S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00134-6. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10342093 Review.
Cited by
-
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(3):1-77. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106301 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors associated with a breast cancer in a population of Moroccan women whose age is less than 40 years: a case control study.Pan Afr Med J. 2016 May 6;24:19. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.19.8784. eCollection 2016. Pan Afr Med J. 2016. PMID: 27583083 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for specific histopathological types of postmenopausal breast cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug 1;178(3):359-71. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws471. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Am J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23899816 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in breast cancer incidence in Hong Kong between 1973 and 1999: an age-period-cohort analysis.Br J Cancer. 2002 Oct 21;87(9):982-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600583. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12434289 Free PMC article.
-
Oral contraceptive use among women in the military and the general U.S. population.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 May;19(5):839-45. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1706. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010. PMID: 20350205 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous