Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1576-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1576.

Prevalence and patterns of smoking in Delhi: cross sectional study

Affiliations

Prevalence and patterns of smoking in Delhi: cross sectional study

K M Narayan et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence and predictors of smoking in urban India.

Design: Cross sectional.

Setting: Delhi, urban India, 1985-6.

Subjects: Random sample of 13,558 men and women aged 25-64 years.

Main outcome measures: Smoking prevalence; subjects who were currently smoking and who had smoked > or = 100 cigarettes or beedis or chuttas in their lifetime were defined as smokers.

Results: 45% (95% confidence interval 43.8 to 46.2) of men and 7% (6.4 to 7.6) of women were smokers. Education was the strongest predictor of smoking, and men with no education were 1.8 (1.5 to 2.0) times more likely to be smokers than those with college education, and women with no education were 3.7 (2.9 to 4.8) times more likely. Among smokers, 52.6% of men and 4.9% of women smoked only cigarettes while the others also smoked beedi or chutta. Compared with cigarette smokers, people smoking beedi or chutta were more likely to be older and married; have lower education, manual occupations, incomes, and body mass index; and not drink alcohol or take part in leisure exercise.

Conclusion: There are two subpopulations of smokers in urban India, and the prevention strategy required for each may be different. The educated, white collar cigarette smoker in India might respond to measures that make non-smoking fashionable, while the less educated, low income people who smoke beedi or chutta may need strategies aimed at socioeconomic improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Prev Med. 1994 Jul;23(4):535-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1990 Dec;80 Suppl:20-6 - PubMed
    1. J Sch Health. 1971 Nov;41(9):497-501 - PubMed
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1973 Sep;14(3):279-86 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rep. 1976 Feb;38(1):251-8 - PubMed

Publication types