Micro-epididymal sperm aspiration or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration? The dilemma

Comparative Study

Y Khalifa et al. Hum Reprod. 1996 Mar.

. 1996 Mar;11(3):680-1.

doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.3.680.

No abstract available

Comment on

Sperm retrieval methods and ICSI for obstructive azoospermia.
Tsirigotis M, Craft I. Tsirigotis M, et al. Hum Reprod. 1995 Apr;10(4):758-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136030. Hum Reprod. 1995. PMID: 7650113 Review. No abstract available.
Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for patients requiring microsurgical sperm aspiration.
Silber SJ, Nagy ZP, Liu J, Godoy H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Silber SJ, et al. Hum Reprod. 1994 Sep;9(9):1705-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138778. Hum Reprod. 1994. PMID: 7836522 Clinical Trial.
Factors influencing the outcome of in-vitro fertilization with percutaneous aspirated epididymal spermatozoa and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermic men.
Craft IL, Khalifa Y, Boulos A, Pelekanos M, Foster C, Tsirigotis M. Craft IL, et al. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1791-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136175. Hum Reprod. 1995. PMID: 8582981