Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Jan;11(1):19-26.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/11.1.19.

A proposal for a two-dose/single-sample in vivo/in vitro rat hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis assay

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A proposal for a two-dose/single-sample in vivo/in vitro rat hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis assay

N W Amphlett et al. Mutagenesis. 1996 Jan.

Abstract

We have developed a two dose/single-sample protocol for the in vivo/in vitro rat hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay. In order to enhance the effectiveness of grain detection by image analysis we found minor technical modifications to be beneficial. These included the use of 3% acetic acid in ethanol (or 4% aqueous paraformaldehyde) for hepatocyte fixation and 0.5% aqueous eosin for staining. Also, there was no correlation between cell viability (measured using the trypan blue method) and UDS response and, therefore, we do not reject animals from data analysis unless hepatocyte viability falls below 50%. Furthermore, we suggest that cell attachment is a more reliable indicator of toxicity than of cell viability. Therefore, our range-finding test has been modified to incorporate an extra animal per group so that hepatocyte cultures can be evaluated. Comparisons of a two-dose/single-sample protocol with the currently accepted single-dose/multiple-sample protocol demonstrated that the former was an acceptable alternative, in that responses with standard positive controls are very similar with both protocols. Furthermore, the two-dose protocol has clear advantages in that it uses fewer animals, resources and time and has better statistical discriminatory power. As a move away from the use of arbitrary values for determining the performance and outcome of assays, we use criteria based on confidence limits placed on historical data ranges. Where necessary, statistical analyses of concurrent data is performed using rank transformation followed by parametric analysis of the ranks; this combines the generality of a non-parametric methodology with the power and versatility of parametric analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources