Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Jan-Feb;49(1):41-8.

[Non-coordinated voiding syndrome: classification and urodynamic characterization]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8678598

[Non-coordinated voiding syndrome: classification and urodynamic characterization]

[Article in Spanish]
M Rapariz González et al. Arch Esp Urol. 1996 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the urodynamic characteristics of uncoordinated voiding.

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with a diagnosis of uncoordinated voiding were studied; 82% were females and 18% were males; mean age 11.9 years (range 5 to 34 yrs). All patients had a complete urodynamic study including patient history, neurological evaluation, uroflowmetry, cystometry and detrusor pressure/voiding flow. The perineal electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded throughout the study using surface electrodes. To rule out neurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyssynergy, periurethral sphincter EMG using concentric nail-electrodes was performed in selected cases (20% of the patients). Based on our urodynamic findings, three subtypes of uncoordinated voiding can be distinguished: Type A: micturition is achieved through detrusor involuntary contraction. Type B: micturition is achieved through detrusor voluntary contraction. Type C: micturition is achieved through abdominal straining.

Results/conclusions: The most important urodynamic findings in uncoordinated voiding, independently of Q max, were the absence of relaxation and increased perineal EMG activity during uroflowmetry. The detrusor pressure/voiding flow test was essential in the classification of uncoordinated voiding. In our series, 58% of the patients were type A, 28% type B and 14% type C.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources