Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Apr;6(2):91-7.

Thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic placement of defibrillator patches

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8680645
Comparative Study

Thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic placement of defibrillator patches

M J Krasna et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Nonthoracotomy lead systems have been developed to reduce the morbidity associated with cardioverter/defibrillator implantation. Total endocardial lead systems are effective in only about 50% of patients with standard monophasic waveforms; so patch placement is frequently required. We developed a new patch design and surgical techniques for thoracoscopic patch placement over the left ventricle and laparoscopic placement under the diaphragm. To compare the efficacy of these approaches, patches were placed in both locations in pigs acutely with a right ventricular coil serving as the anode for defibrillation. Defibrillation testing was performed, alternating between patches. The energies associated with 50% (DF50) and 90% (DF90) probability of successful defibrillation with biphasic shocks with determined. Defibrillator thresholds were significantly lower with intrathoracic than with subdiaphragmatic patches. Animal autopsy following more than 30 shocks from each patch revealed no gross damage to the lung or diaphragm in any animal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources