Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
- PMID: 8683820
Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
Abstract
The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments was convened by President Clinton in January 1994 in response to allegations of unethical practices in radiation experiments involving human subjects that were sponsored by the US government between 1944 and 1974. The committee's Final Report was released in October 1995. In addition to analyzing the history of the ethics of medical research involving human subjects, the committee reviewed current federal policies and procedures for protection of human subjects. In this article, the committee's findings are discussed as they relate to the patient-physician relationship, the issue of trust, and the specific role of the physician-investigator in all types of human experimentation. The committee found evidence of discussion of the conduct of human research at the highest levels of the government and within the medical profession, particularly with regard to risk, during the 1940s and 1950s. However, in both federal policy and professional practice, requirements for consent were more likely to apply to "healthy volunteers" than to patient-subjects (ie, those with disease or illness). Today, consensus exists that duties to obtain informed consent apply to all human subjects, whether healthy or sick, regardless of the risk or potential for medical benefit from participation in the research and regardless of the nature of sponsorship or funding (eg, federal, military, or private). Based on a finding of serious deficiencies in the current system of protections for human subjects, the committee offers a number of recommendations, including changes in institutional review boards; in the interpretation of ethics rules and policies; in oversight, accountability, and sanctions for ethics violations; and in compensation for research injuries. More than public policy changes, however, the committee recommends that the medical profession intensify its commitment to the ethics of research involving human subjects.
Similar articles
-
Radiation.JAMA. 1996 Aug 7;276(5):421-3. JAMA. 1996. PMID: 11644795 No abstract available.
-
Are research subjects adequately protected? A review and discussion of studies conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):271-82. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0026. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996. PMID: 11653398
-
Revising the history of Cold War research ethics.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):223-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0025. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996. PMID: 11653394
-
The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation.J Leg Med. 1998 Jun;19(2):157-221. doi: 10.1080/01947649809511059. J Leg Med. 1998. PMID: 9658739 Review. No abstract available.
-
Cognitively impaired subjects. American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 1989 Nov 15;111(10):843-8. Ann Intern Med. 1989. PMID: 2683918 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Lost and (not yet) found.HEC Forum. 1996 Dec;8(6):372-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00119944. HEC Forum. 1996. PMID: 10165166 Review. No abstract available.
-
Saving normal tissues - a goal for the ages.Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Jul;95(7):920-935. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1589654. Epub 2019 Mar 29. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019. PMID: 30822213 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methods for Increasing Recruitment and Retention of Ethnic Minorities in Health Research Through Addressing Ethical Concerns.Seventh Conf Health Survey Res Methods (1999). 2001 Feb;2001:97-99. Seventh Conf Health Survey Res Methods (1999). 2001. PMID: 25568894 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources