Recanalization of obstructed fallopian tube by selective salpingography and transvaginal bougie dilatation: outcome and cost analysis
- PMID: 8690103
- DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58440-4
Recanalization of obstructed fallopian tube by selective salpingography and transvaginal bougie dilatation: outcome and cost analysis
Abstract
Objective: To investigate effectiveness and cost of transcervical salpingography and recanalization in the management of infertility caused by tubal occlusion.
Design: Retrospective analysis of patients investigated with transcervical selective salpingography and, in some instances, treated by transcervical recanalization.
Setting: Four hundred patients with hysterosalpingography diagnosis of obstructed fallopian tubes (clinical environment) are investigated. A repeat hysterosalpingogram after administration of a prostaglandin antagonist demonstrated patency of the tubes in 82 patients and selective transcervical salpingography demonstrated patency in an additional 131 patients.
Intervention: Transcervical tubal recanalization. Of the remaining 187 patients, recanalization by transcervical technique was successful in 145 patients. The underlying etiology for tubal obstruction was salpingitis isthmica nodosa in 62, salpingitis and perisalpingitis in 71, endometriosis in 8, failed surgical anastomosis in 43, and undeterminate cause in 3 patients. Pregnancy was attained in 24 patients, there were 10 minor and 1 major complication.
Outcome measure: Attained and maintained patency of tubes, pregnancy, attendant complications.
Conclusion: A pregnancy rate of 12.8% was attained after transcervical recanalization of obstructed tubes. An attendant increased rate of pregnancy in patients proven patent after selective salpingography, valuable detailed information about proximal and distal tubes after recanalization of the obstructed proximal tube segment, the low rate of complications, and low cost are factors recommending the use of this technique. Moreover, tubal surgery or IVF treatment are not influenced adversely by prior transcervical tubal recanalization and remain an option for patients who failed to attain pregnancy.
Comment in
-
Validity of comparisons?Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):427-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01892-1. Fertil Steril. 2001. PMID: 11503610 No abstract available.
-
The use of repeat hysterosalpingography.Fertil Steril. 2001 Oct;76(4):849-50. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02074-x. Fertil Steril. 2001. PMID: 11680433 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
